How public education
cripples our kids, and why
"I taught for thirty years in some of the
worst schools in Manhattan, and in some of the best, and during that time I
became an expert in boredom. Boredom was everywhere in my world, and if you
asked the kids, as I often did, why they felt so bored, they
always gave the same answers: They said the work
was stupid, that it made no sense, that they already knew it. They said they wanted to be doing something real, not just
sitting around. They said teachers
didn't seem to know much about their subjects and clearly weren't interested in
learning more. And the kids were right: their teachers were every bit as bored as they were."
We believe that in John Grotto’s work “Against School”, he is
explaining how the current school system we have now is not teaching anything
to students. “They said the work was stupid, that it made no sense, that they
already knew it.” Here he explains that the students feel that they learn
nothing, he explains how the students feel about their work which obviously is
not good. “They said they wanted to be doing something real, not just
sitting around. They said teachers didn't seem to know much about their
subjects and clearly weren't interested in learning more.” And here he explains
how the students wanted to learn new things but were not able to due to the
teachers not knowing their own subject or wanting to learn more about it
themselves. “Teachers were every bit as bored as they were.” Lastly here he
explains the problem. If the teachers are as bored as the students then the
students will not learn anything because there is no instinctive to learn.
We agree that Gatto is right but wrong, with his opinion. In the
writing there are many examples of bias due to his experience in
Manhattan. “I taught for thirty years in some of the worst schools in
Manhattan, and in some of the best, and during that time I became an expert in
boredom.” Here he generalizes all schools with what he learned or experienced
in Manhattan. “Boredom is the common condition of school teachers” Again this
is bias from what he learns, and this is his personal belief. Yes in school
there are good teachers and bad teachers, but to claim all of them to be
“Bored” is a pretty big generalization that we felt was not accurate. “Of
course, teachers are themselves products of the same twelve-year compulsory school
programs that so thoroughly bore their students,” Yes it is true that the
teachers come from the same school system as us, but all teachers come from a
different era and area of school from us, which makes their school experience
different from ours. “Who wouldn't get bored teaching students who are rude and
interested only in grades? If even that.” While this is true for the most part
in teachers who have the misfortune of having a bad class, some teachers do not
find this as an excuse and actually make the students thrive. This idea of
teachers taking a “Bad” class as a challenge and then turn around and make the
students thrive can be seen in the Escalante case where he turned a class of
students who would have dropped out and helped them thrive in school.
I like how you too pointed out the biases in gattos article, I would also agree that gatto is both right and wrong on the subject at hand, though i would put him more in the wrong.
ReplyDelete